When Brands Stop Chasing Attention, Start Creating Attachment
Droga5 São Paulo's Diego Limberti and Black Madre Studio's André Maciel explain why brand recall and emotional loyalty is built through authentic design, strong brand identity, and meaning rather than rewards.
The assumption was simple: the more often people saw a brand, the more likely they were to remember it, engage with it, and eventually buy from it. Loyalty was something businesses attempted to engineer through points, rewards, discounts, and increasingly personalised experiences.
Yet, those mechanics have produced diminishing returns. Consumers are surrounded by brands that know how to capture attention, but far fewer know how to create attachment. Visibility is abundant. Meaning is not.
That shift is forcing creative leaders to ask a different question. If every brand can optimise for engagement, what makes one brand stay with people long after the campaign ends?
For Diego Limberti, Chief Design Officer at Droga5 São Paulo, the answer begins beneath the surface. Design should not simply communicate an idea; it should embody it. Every material, process, and visual decision contributes to whether people merely notice a brand or genuinely believe it.
André Maciel, Creative Director at Black Madre Studio, arrives at a similar conclusion from a branding perspective. Emotional loyalty, he argues, is rarely built through incentives. It emerges when brands develop an identity strong enough to occupy a lasting place in people’s lives.
Together, their perspectives point toward a broader shift taking place across modern branding. As digital experiences become increasingly frictionless and interchangeable, the brands that endure may be those that stop chasing attention and start creating meaning.
When Loyalty Stops Being Transactional
For decades, loyalty programmes have operated on a familiar exchange.
Customers spend money. Brands offer points, discounts, or rewards in return. The relationship is measured through transactions, with retention often depending on how attractive the next incentive happens to be.
That model is beginning to show its limits. Consumers today have access to countless reward programmes offering nearly identical benefits. When every brand competes using the same mechanics, loyalty becomes increasingly fragile because someone else can almost always offer a better incentive.
According to Maciel, the real currency is beginning to change.
“The currency shifts from benefits to identification,” he says. “When a brand has a clear identity, it stops competing on incentives and starts occupying a symbolic space in people’s lives.”
That transition changes how emotional connection is built.
Instead of relying on mechanics, brands increasingly earn loyalty by creating meaning through consistency and cultural relevance.
What emotional loyalty increasingly looks like:
- People return without needing constant rewards or reminders.
- Customers recommend and defend brands voluntarily.
- Relationships are sustained by meaning rather than mechanics.
- Identity becomes more influential than incentives.
Maciel believes the distinction becomes obvious over time. “Performative engagement is a response to format. Genuine connection is a response to meaning.” If a relationship depends on continually introducing new incentives, he argues, “it probably was never deep to begin with.”
Loyalty, in other words, is gradually moving beyond transactions toward identification.
The Difference Between Looking Good and Feeling True
Design has traditionally been evaluated through aesthetics.
Does it look distinctive? Is it visually appealing? Does it attract attention?
But appearance alone rarely creates an emotional connection. People may admire beautiful work without ever feeling attached to it. What endures is often something far less obvious: coherence.
For Limberti, design begins to matter when it stops decorating an idea and starts expressing it through every element of its construction. “Colour theory only matters when it stops being decorative and becomes structural,” he explains. “When it’s connected to something real, it stops being aesthetics and becomes meaning.”
He points to a project where blue and yellow combine to create green, not as a stylistic decision, but as a reflection of how ecosystems function. Because that interaction exists within both the concept and the production process itself, the audience experiences the idea rather than simply observing it.
That philosophy extends beyond colour.
Craft, natural pigments, and screen printing introduce variation, texture, and unpredictability that digital production often removes. “Craft introduces resistance, and that resistance is what creates value,” Limberti says. “When something is less controlled, it feels closer, and that’s where emotional depth comes from.”
The same principle shapes sustainability. Rather than adding sustainable materials after an idea has been developed, Limberti argues that they should define the idea from the beginning. “When what you say and how you make it are aligned,” he says, “the message stops being rhetoric and becomes truth.”
Ultimately, audiences may not consciously analyse those decisions, but they recognise their coherence. “A visual feels true when there’s no gap between idea, process, and execution,” Limberti explains. “People might not rationalise it, but they feel it. And that feeling builds trust.”
Why the Most Memorable Brands Don’t Chase Attention
Modern marketing has become remarkably efficient at capturing attention.
Algorithms optimise reach. Platforms reward visibility. Campaigns compete for impressions in increasingly crowded digital spaces.
Yet attention and connection are no longer the same thing.
Maciel believes many brands mistake recognition for relevance.
“What’s remembered is usually well executed. What’s felt has identity,” he says. Visibility may generate recall, but it rarely builds relationships on its own.
That distinction is becoming increasingly important because consumers encounter thousands of commercial messages every day. Standing out for a moment is difficult enough. Remaining meaningful long afterwards is considerably harder.
Brands that build lasting relevance tend to behave differently:
- They respond to cultural tensions instead of simply following trends.
- They maintain a recognisable point of view across campaigns.
- They prioritise consistency over short-term visibility.
- They create work that remains identifiable even without a logo.
Maciel argues that emotional resonance comes from understanding context rather than manufacturing emotion. “It’s about not being generic,” he says. “What’s generic doesn’t resonate; it just passes by.”
He makes a similar point about cultural relevance.
“Cultural tension is raw material. It’s where real relevance lives.” But engaging with culture requires continuity, not opportunism. Brands that appear only while a topic is trending rarely build lasting credibility because audiences recognise the difference between participation and commitment.
In the long run, the brands people remember are rarely those that shouted the loudest. They are the ones whose identity remained unmistakably their own.
The Brands People Choose Even When They Don’t Have To
Perhaps the strongest brands are not those that persuade people to buy once. They are the ones people continue choosing long after incentives disappear and alternatives become equally accessible.
That kind of preference rarely emerges from a single campaign. It develops gradually through repeated experiences that reinforce the same values, the same point of view, and the same sense of authenticity.
Maciel believes emotional loyalty reveals itself through behaviour rather than metrics. People return voluntarily. They recommend brands without being prompted. They defend them because the relationship has moved beyond utility into identification.
Design plays an equally important role in sustaining that relationship.
Limberti argues that trust grows when every aspect of a brand reflects the same underlying idea. Materials, production methods, colour, craft, and execution should all reinforce one another instead of pulling in different directions. Coherence, rather than perfection, becomes the foundation of credibility.
Together, those ideas point to a broader evolution in branding.
In an era where almost everything competes for attention, the brands that endure will be the ones that feel unmistakably true, brands people continue choosing not because they have to, but because the relationship itself has become meaningful.
ALSO READ: Building AI Programmes that Balance Speed and Responsibility
